You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
IBM Mergers: Closing on HashiCorp and Intent to Acquire Datastax – Alt + E S V



Skip to Content

RedMonk

the developer-focused industry analyst firm

Become a client

Menu

Videos

Research

Events

About

Team

Services

Briefings

Consults

Projects and Media

Clients

Contact

Newsletter

Search

@redmonk

Alt + E S V

IBM Mergers: Closing on HashiCorp and Intent to Acquire Datastax

By
Rachel Stephens
|

@rstephensme
|

March 14, 2025

Share via Twitter

Share via Facebook

Share via Linkedin

Share via Reddit

After ten months of regulatory review, on
Feb 27 2025
IBM closed its acquisition of HashiCorp for $6.4B (or $35/share in cash.) The RedMonk team has collectively been busy on the road, planning conferences, and writing books, but we still wanted to come together and share our thoughts on the merger. We’ll also share some initial reactions about the announcement of the
intent to buy DataStax
.

Below is a team Q&A with our thoughts about the deals.

Q0: Before we dive into our deal analysis, let’s give some background on HashiCorp.

Rachel
: At a high level HashiCorp plays in the infrastructure automation and infrastructure management space, providing tools for provisioning, securing, connecting, and running cloud-native and hybrid environments.

Its products like Terraform, Vault, Consul, and Nomad, focus on Infrastructure as Code (IaC), secrets management, service networking, and workload orchestration.

Terraform and Vault are the products that garner the most attention and usage. From a revenue perspective, Vault is the most monetizable product in the HashiCorp portfolio; from a community perspective, Terraform is the heart of HashiCorp.

HashiCorp went public in December 2021 and
struggled to find their financial footing in the market thereafter
.

HashiCorp originally operated as an open core company before
changing their license to the BSL in 2023
.

If you want more details about IBM and HashiCorp at the time of the deal announcement, you should read this
amazingly good piece of analysis
by former Monk Fintan Ryan.

Q1: Why does this acquisition make sense for IBM? How does it benefit HashiCorp?

James
: It hasn’t been easy for IBM to find its footing in recent years, but historically it has strong enterprise presence and when it comes to middleware, IBM pretty much invented the concept. And as of late, IBM is having a bit of a moment in the sun; it’s turning in good financial results and its share price is pretty good. Enterprises are willing to have conversations with IBM at the moment, pretty clearly; they’re interested in its story around AI. The Red Hat acquisition is working pretty well.

Adding HashiCorp as a string to the bow in its middleware portfolio makes sense.

From HashiCorp’s side, their financial results post-IPO were down; that’s one of the reasons it was on the block as a possible acquisition target. It was clear they were going to need a shot in the arm, and it is up to IBM to provide that boost and drive sales again. The alignment is good around IBM’s core strategic planks of AI and hybrid cloud. Infrastructure as Code is going to be absolutely foundational to hybrid cloud. We’ve talked about the hybrid cloud market for a long time, but because of geopolitics right now it is likely to be even more attractive in 2025.

Q2: How do you see the relationship between HashiCorp and Red Hat? In particular, how do you anticipate them finessing the portfolio overlap between Ansible and Terraform?

Kelly
: Both
Red Hat’s Ansible Automation Platform
and
Hashicorp’s Terraform
play in the infrastructure automation space. Notably, both products have their roots in open source, with Red Hat AAP building on
upstream OSS projects
and
Terraform
previously available under an open source license prior its relicense in 2023 (see more from Steve O’Grady on this). While both Ansible and Terraform can be (and are) used for a wide range of automation objectives, Terraform
uses a specific language
and has strengths in areas like infrastructure provisioning and other IaC processes, whereas Ansible leverages YAML and shines in configuration management, software deployment, and orchestration.

Most organizations leverage multiple automation tools, with the Ansible/Terraform combination common enough that it has earned the nickname “Terrible” (or, alternatively, “Terrable” or “Ansiform”), and led to “better together” stories from
Red Hat
and
Hashicorp
. With IBM now owning both, many are curious to see how the “better together” story plays out vis-a-vis more intentional integration (or at least usage guidance) between the two.

Rachel
: Even if we leave product overlap capabilities out of it, it feels like it will be a challenge for their sales and marketing teams to effectively communicate a nuanced shift to something like BSL licensing. Red Hat is a bastion of open source software, and BSL is a squishy in between.

Steve
: Indeed. The BSL is a source available, non-compete license. The intent was to improve HashiCorp’s ability to monetize its previously open source assets by attempting to make the company the exclusive commercial supplier. In practice, however, the returns on this strategy – for HashiCorp
specifically
and the market more
generally
– are best described as mixed. Certainly the relicensing produced no abrupt change in direction from a financial returns standpoint.

The question facing IBM post-acquisition is whether to continue with this strategy or to revisit it given the difference in context between HashiCorp assets independent of IBM and now as part of its portfolio. To date, neither the acquiring or acquired company has given any indication of a change of heart in its license, and days after the acquisition has closed the projects’ various licenses are still BSL in public repositories. A fact which would seem to indicate that the status quo will persist.

Assuming it will for the sake of argument, that leaves questions to be answered.

How will IBM, and more problematically Red Hat, salespeople manage a third license type? To date, customer conversations were generally simple: software was either proprietary or it was open source. Adding HashiCorp assets to the portfolio makes those conversations – particularly with legal staffs and Open Source Program Offices (OSPO) – potentially more challenging.

What does this mean for forks such as OpenBao and OpenTofu? Up until the acquisition closed, some potential participants in the forks of Vault and Terraform respectively could have been waiting to see whether IBM, a company with a long history within open source itself and of managing the world’s largest pure play commercial open source software vendor might return the projects to their roots. With that option now seemingly off the table, does it create new incentive for participation in the project forks, or will they continue unimpacted?

Q3: What does this merger mean for competitors and the IaC market as a whole?

James
: The combination of Terraform and Ansible is pretty clearly a roll up of assets in the IaC market. I suspect this market concentration was part of the reason why regulatory review took so long. One of the questions is how IBM’s strategic imperative around AI will impact IaC. Can IBM use AI to add substantive value to all of these automation tools, as opposed to AI being something that at times might begin to look almost a replacement to them?

Rachel
: There are definitely market questions about we are headed in terms of declarative infrastructure, even without factoring AI in. In general we are hearing less and less about earlier generations of configuration tools like Chef, Puppet, and SaltStack. Things in the CNCF ecosystem like Crossplane and Pulumi and more visible. Then we see new competitors like System Initiative aggressively targeting the HashiCorp install base. Ansible and Terraform are a powerful combination, but there are a lot of future-facing tools that are trying to replace them. Then, as noted, adding in AI muddies the water even further.

Q4: Just as the IBM and HashiCorp deal finally closed, IBM also announced its
intent to acquire DataStax
. Who is DataStax and why are they an interesting acquisition target for IBM?

Steve
: DataStax is the primary commercial vendor behind Cassandra, a columnar database originally written by Facebook to manage its Inbox and later made available as an Apache Software Foundation (ASF) open source project. The open source Cassandra project has long has a reputation of being a highly scalable database, but also being difficult to stand up and operate, hence the commercial opportunity for a DataStax.

As with many of its commercial database vendor counterparts, DataStax has expanded aggressively from its original columnar roots over the years, embracing among others streaming and vector workloads. The latter, in combination with Langflow, is presumably one of the primary justifications for its acquisition by IBM.

Q5: Say more about the Langflow and the collision of databases and app platforms. Why is that of particular interest to IBM right now?

Steve
: One of the things that has seemed apparent for
some time
is that application and database layers are likely to become less distinct. Compute, database and other primitives will clearly exist independently indefinitely, but the rise of abstract platforms like Fly.io, Netlify, Render, Vercel, et al following in Heroku’s original footsteps means that database and application platforms are increasingly comingled.

AI, for its part, seems likely to accelerate this trend. As large data platforms like Databricks and Snowflake invest heavily in models, and LLM tooling becomes more and more adept at making data accessible to all personas via natural language queries rather than just those familiar with SQL, the lines between data and analytical applications
blur
.

DataStax’ Langflow targets just this type of opportunity, with a low code tool designed to simply link models, APIs and databases. With IBM focused on bringing AI to enterprises with its watsonx tooling and Granite models, DataStax and Langflow make for a logical acquisition target.

Closing thoughts

Rachel
: As with the
Red Hat-IBM merger
, we will be watching the specifics of the HashiCorp-IBM merger closely. Much of the success will ride on execution: how and where will the products be integrated into the company? what decisions will be made around licenses? how will sales teams be trained to talk about nuances of the portfolios? how are things like cultural mismatches or leadership changes handled?

Mergers are fickle and statistically difficult to pull off, even when all parties enter with a shared vision for success. The products in the HashiCorp portfolio play integral roles in the technical ecosystem, however, so there’s a lot riding on this particular transaction for both IBM and the market more broadly.

Disclaimer
: Hashicorp, IBM, Red Hat, and Salesforce (Heroku) are RedMonk clients. CNCF, Databricks, DataStax, Fly.io, Netlify, Pulumi, Render, Snowflake and Vercel are not.

No Comments

Leave a Reply
Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published.

Required fields are marked
*
Comment
*

Name
*

Email
*

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Δ

About

I’m Rachel Stephens, Research Director with RedMonk. I focus on helping clients understand and contextualize technology adoption trends, particularly from the lens of the practitioner. I cover a broad range of developer and infrastructure products, with a particular focus on developer tools.

Before joining RedMonk, I worked as a database administrator and financial analyst. I am located in Colorado.

Bluesky

Mastodon

Twitter

LinkedIn

GitHub

RSS Feed

Subscribe via Email

Email Address

Subscribe

Recent Posts

The Mighty Duck

More Than Syntax

RedMonk Top 20 Languages Over Time: January 2026

The Disintermediation of Databases

DORA 2025: Measuring Software Delivery After AI

Search for:

Categories
Categories

Select Category

Accounting

Adobe

AI

Airtable

Akamai

Akka

Algolia

Algorithms

Alibaba

Amazon

Apache

APIs

Apollo GraphQL

Apple

Architecture

ARM

ARM

Asana

Atlassian

Augment Code

Automation

Baidu

Bitnami

Blockchain

By the Numbers

CDN

CenturyLink

Circonus

ClickHouse

Client Profile

Cloud

CloudBees

CloudFlare

CNCF

Company

Compliance

Conferences

Confluent

Containers

Crunchy Data

Culture

D&I

Data

Data Engineering

Databases

Databricks

Datadog

Datastax

Developers

DevOps

Digital Ocean

Docker

DuckDB

eBPF

Eclipse

Economics

Edge

Elastic

Facebook

Fauna

featured-data

Finance

Fly.io

Foundations

FusionAuth

Giphy

GitHub

GitLab

GitOps

Google

Grafana Labs

GraphQL

Hardware

Hashicorp

Hasura

History

Honeycomb

HP

IBM

Incident Management

InfluxData

Intel

IoT

JFrog

LaunchDarkly

Licensing

Linux Foundation

LLMs

Low Code

M&A

Machine Learning

Meta

Microsoft

Modernization

MongoDB

Monitoring

Monki Gras

Monktoberfest

Neon

Netflix

Netlify

Nvidia

Observability

Open Source

Operators

Oracle

PagerDuty

Parquet

Personal

Pivotal

Platforms

Prisma

Programming Languages

Progressive Delivery

Project Management

Pulumi

RackN

Rackspace

Red Hat

Render

Replicated

Salesforce

Samsung

SAP

Security

Serverless

Slackchat

Smartsheet

Snapchat

Snowflake

SoftBank

Spec Development

Splunk

spreadsheet.com

Spreadsheets

Stack Overflow

StackPath

StepZen

Sumo Logic

System Initiative

Tencent

Transposit

Travel

Twilio

Twitter

Uncategorized

Vercel

vFunction

Vibe Coding

VMware

WASM

Web Development

Web3

Wired

xMatters

Yahoo

Archives

Archives

Select Month

August 2026 (1)

June 2026 (1)

April 2026 (1)

February 2026 (1)

December 2025 (1)

November 2025 (1)

September 2025 (2)

August 2025 (1)

July 2025 (1)

June 2025 (3)

May 2025 (1)

April 2025 (2)

March 2025 (1)

December 2024 (2)

November 2024 (2)

October 2024 (1)

September 2024 (2)

August 2024 (1)

May 2024 (1)

April 2024 (3)

March 2024 (1)

January 2024 (2)

December 2023 (1)

September 2023 (1)

July 2023 (2)

June 2023 (1)

May 2023 (1)

April 2023 (2)

March 2023 (3)

February 2023 (2)

January 2023 (1)

December 2022 (1)

November 2022 (2)

October 2022 (1)

September 2022 (1)

August 2022 (1)

June 2022 (1)

April 2022 (1)

March 2022 (1)

February 2022 (2)

January 2022 (1)

December 2021 (3)

November 2021 (1)

October 2021 (1)

September 2021 (1)

August 2021 (1)

July 2021 (1)

June 2021 (2)

April 2021 (1)

March 2021 (1)

December 2020 (1)

October 2020 (2)

September 2020 (1)

July 2020 (2)

May 2020 (1)

April 2020 (2)

March 2020 (2)

February 2020 (2)

January 2020 (3)

November 2019 (1)

October 2019 (2)

September 2019 (2)

August 2019 (1)

July 2019 (1)

June 2019 (3)

May 2019 (2)

April 2019 (2)

March 2019 (2)

February 2019 (3)

December 2018 (1)

November 2018 (2)

October 2018 (1)

September 2018 (2)

August 2018 (3)

July 2018 (3)

June 2018 (2)

May 2018 (1)

April 2018 (2)

March 2018 (2)

February 2018 (3)

January 2018 (1)

September 2017 (2)

August 2017 (1)

July 2017 (2)

June 2017 (1)

May 2017 (2)

April 2017 (1)

March 2017 (2)

February 2017 (3)

January 2017 (1)

December 2016 (2)

November 2016 (4)

October 2016 (2)

September 2016 (3)

August 2016 (5)

July 2016 (7)

June 2016 (3)

May 2016 (1)

Recent Comments
Trevor Mitchell
on
Heroku in 2025
16 Cute and Cuddly Animals You’ll Fall in Love With, Just Like Koalas – Animals Realm
on
You Otter Know
Alex Williams
on
IANAL: agent edition
Rob Hirschfeld
on
Under New Management: Impressions from VMware Explore 2024
RobBob
on
AI Headshots vs. My Senior Pictures

Clients

Contact

Services

Briefings

[email protected]

RedMonk

411 Congress St

Portland, ME 04101

Bluesky

LinkedIn

Newsletter

YouTube
</reference>

<statements>
1. IBM completed its $6.4 billion HashiCorp acquisition (Feb 27, 2025).
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.