You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
Criminal Charges & Civil Lawsuits in California Tesla Autopilot Crash

Los Angeles County prosecutors filed historic criminal charges following a crash involving Tesla’s automated driving system.

Skip to main content
Skip to primary sidebar
New Hdr Right

Finding answers after your accident

Contributor login
Search
Get help

Call Now
Nav Menu

Find a Lawyer
Accident Resources

Personal Injury Law

You've been hurt. Now what?
Do I have a claim?
Finding the best attorney to represent you
Dealing with insurance
Laws by state
View all

Accident Types

Car accident
Truck accident
Workplace injury
Wrongful death
View all

Workers' Comp

Common work injuries
Finding the best workers’ comp lawyers
How workers’ comp benefits work
Personal injury vs. workers’ compensation
View all

Injury Guides

Spinal cord / column
Brain Injury
Occupational injuries
Whiplash
View all

More

Blog
Questions & answers
Tell your story
Forms and worksheets
Videos
For students
Our Safety Allies
About us
Legal dictionary

Attorney Marketing

VOICES program
Contributor plan
Partner plan
Social media marketing
All plans
Enjuris badges

Accident Help (Home)
»
Injury Blog
»
Felony Charges Filed in Fatal California Crash Involving Tesla’s Autopilot

Felony Charges Filed in Fatal California Crash Involving Tesla’s Autopilot

How can I contribute?
About
Enjuris Attorney Editor

Contributor:
Enjuris Attorney Editor

Tesla is making history, but this time for the wrong reasons.

Los Angeles County prosecutors recently filed 2 counts of vehicular manslaughter against the driver of a Tesla Model S. The driver is the 1st person to be charged with a felony in the United States for a fatal crash involving an automated driving system.

Although the historic criminal charges are getting most of the headlines, a couple of related civil lawsuits filed against the driver could have far-reaching implications.

The accident

On December 29, 2019, Kevin George Aziz Riad was driving his black Tesla Model S at a high speed when it ran a red light in the Los Angeles suburb of Gardena and slammed into the driver’s side of a Honda Civic heading west on Artesia Boulevard.

Both occupants of the Honda Civic, Gilberto Alcazar Lopez, age 40, and Maria Guadalupe Nieves-López, age 39, died at the scene.

Investigators from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) confirmed that the Tesla’s Autopilot features were in use at the time of the crash.

Tesla’s Autopilot system, which comes standard on every new Tesla, is an advanced driver-assistance system that, among other things, enables the vehicle to steer, accelerate, and brake on its own.

Although Tesla’s Autopilot system is intended to “enhance safety and convenience behind the wheel,” the NHTSA has
spent a significant amount of time
reviewing the widespread misuse of Autopilot by drivers whose overconfidence and inattention (termed “automation complacency”) has been blamed for multiple crashes.

Criminal charges filed against the driver

Los Angeles County prosecutors filed 2 counts of vehicular manslaughter against Kevin George Aziz Riad following the accident. Vehicular manslaughter carries a penalty of up to 6 years in California State Prison and fines up to $10,000.

Riad pleaded not guilty and is free on bail while the case is pending.

The charges are historic, as they mark the 1st U.S. case in which serious criminal charges were filed in a
fatal crash
involving an automated driving system.

Facing facts:
An estimated 765,000 Tesla vehicles are currently equipped with automated driving systems in the U.S.

Civil charges filed against the driver and Tesla

The families of the victims have filed
wrongful death lawsuits
against Kevin George Aziz Riad
and
Tesla.

The lawsuits filed against Riad allege that he was
negligent
for being inattentive and failing to stop at a red light. The lawsuits filed against Tesla claim that Tesla sold a defective vehicle that “suddenly and unintentionally accelerated to an excessive, unsafe, and uncontrollable speed” and lacked an effective automatic emergency braking system.

A joint trial is scheduled for 2023.

Auto accident liability for self-driving cars

The question of who should be held civilly liable—the driver or the manufacturer—when an automated car causes an accident has been the topic of
much debate
.

Practically speaking, if you’re injured in a
self-driving car accident
, your lawyer is likely to sue both the manufacturer
and
the driver of the vehicle.

The wrongful death lawsuits filed against Riad and Tesla could set a powerful precedent for holding the driver, manufacturer, or both liable following a crash.

Criminal vs. civil cases

When a person is arrested and charged with a crime, they are brought to a criminal court where the government, on behalf of the people of the U.S., prosecutes the case. The goal of a criminal court is to punish criminals through fines or jail time.

When a person (called a “plaintiff”) sues another person (called a “defendant”) for damages, they do so in a civil court. The goal of a civil court is to compensate the plaintiff for any injuries they suffered as a result of the defendant’s actions or inactions.

A
car accident case
can be tried in a civil court even if no criminal charges are filed against the defendant. What’s more, because civil suits use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, which is less stringent than the criminal “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, victims of a
car accident
can recover civil damages even if the criminal court declares the defendant innocent of the crime.

Enjuris tip:
Learn more about the
differences between civil and criminal law
.

USDOT’s New Regulation: AEB Systems Required in Cars by 2029

New mandate for Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in cars by 2029 aims to reduce accidents and enhance driver protection through advanced technology.

Learn more

Filed Under:
California

Primary Sidebar

Grow your personal injury law firm. Attract & convert more clients.

Tired of expensive marketing
that doesn't deliver?

Partner with Enjuris and reach millions of accident victims actively seeking legal help.

Join Enjuris Partners

Enjuris Partners

AL
-
Nomberg Law Firm

CO
-
Babcock Tucker

FL
-
Lorenzo & Lorenzo

Palmer | Lopez

GA
-
Gerber & Elkins Law

MT
-
Murphy Law Firm

SC
-
Chappell, Chappell & Newman

TX
-
Brown Trial Firm

Neal Davis Law Firm

Blog categories

News Stories

My Accident Story

Resources You'll Love

Questions & Answers

In your state

AL

AZ

CA

CO

FL

GA

IN

MT

NC

OH

SC

TN

TX
Attorneys, write for Enjuris. Join our Contributor Program.
Start Writing
Footer Form

Need an attorney?

Our
Enjuris Partners
are ready to help

FIND OUT IF YOU HAVE A CASE

Start here

© 2026 Enjuris. All rights reserved.

Reader survey

Learn about

Car accident attorneys

Defective product attorneys

Personal injury attorneys

Medical malpractice attorneys

Wrongful death attorneys

Workers compensation attorneys

Birth injury attorneys

Personal injury lawyers: Partner with us

Lawyer online marketing

System overview
Video

Powered by

3690 West Gandy Blvd., Suite 444

Tampa, FL 33611
Attorney SEO services

Enjuris
is a platform dedicated to helping people who are dealing with life-altering accidents and injuries. We support
students
, families, caregivers and communities with resources,
personal stories
and a
national directory
of partner attorneys.

Copyright © 2026 Enjuris.com. All rights reserved. The accuracy, completeness, or currency of information on this site is not guaranteed. The information provided is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client relationship is or will be formed by use of this site. For state-specific information, particularly regarding attorney advertising, refer to the Terms of Use. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the
Terms of Use
and
Privacy Policy
.

×

Press Enter to Search
</reference>

<statements>
1. This outcome established an important criminal precedent: relying on Level 2 automation cannot be raised as an affirmative defense to negate personal criminal negligence
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.