You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
Judge orders trial in Tesla autopilot manslaughter case | Courthouse News Service

Kevin George Aziz Riad's Tesla was hurtling at 74 miles an hour on a surface street when the crash occurred.

Updates to our Terms of Use
We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

I agree to the
Terms of Use
and acknowledge that my information will be used as described in the
Privacy Policy

Submit

Log in to CasePortal

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Free Litigation Reports

Find Judicial Opinions
Appeals
Arts
Business
Civil Rights
Consumers
Courts
Criminal
Economy
Education
Employment
Energy
Entertainment
Environment
Features
Financial
Government
Health
International
Law
Media
National
Op-Ed
Personal Injury
Podcast
Politics
Regional
Religion
Science
Securities
Sports
Technology
Trials

Log in to CasePortal

Search Articles
Free Litigation Reports

Find Judicial Opinions
Search
Appeals
Business
Consumers
Criminal
Education
Energy
Environment
Financial
Health
Law
National
Personal Injury
Politics
Religion
Securities
Technology
Arts
Civil Rights
Courts
Economy
Employment
Entertainment
Features
Government
International
Media
Op-Ed
Podcast
Regional
Science
Sports
Trials

Free Litigation Reports

Find Judicial Opinions

Log in to CasePortal
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
View Back issues

Wednesday, April 23, 2025
Business
Courts
Economy
Entertainment
Op-Ed
Politics
Podcast
Science
Trials
More
Appeals
Arts
Civil Rights
Consumers
Criminal
Education
Employment
Energy
Environment
Features
Financial
Government
Health
International
Law
Media
National
Personal Injury
Regional
Religion
Securities
Sports
Technology
Judge orders trial in Tesla autopilot manslaughter case
Kevin George Aziz Riad's Tesla was hurtling at 74 miles an hour on a surface street when the crash occurred.
Hillel Aron

/ May 19, 2022
Link copied

Tesla's logo sits on an unsold 2020 Model X at a dealership in Littleton, Colo., on Feb. 2, 2020. (David Zalubowski/AP)
(CN) — The case against Kevin Riad, believed to be the first driver to face manslaughter charges over a crash while using Tesla’s “Autopilot” self-driving feature, can proceed to trial, a judge ruled Thursday after a two-hour preliminary hearing.
Riad faces manslaughter and gross negligence charges over a 2019 crash that killed two people. He has pleaded not guilty to both charges and declined to comment Thursday.
Gilberto Lopez, 40, and Maria Nieves, 39, were on their first date on Dec. 29, 2019, sometime after 12:30 a.m. according to prosecutor Brandy Chase. Lopez was driving a black Honda Civic; Nieves was in the passenger seat. As Lopez was turning left at a turn light, Riad’s gray Model S Tesla smashed into them, killing them both. Riad and the passenger in his vehicle were taken to the hospital but were not seriously injured.
At the preliminary hearing, in which a judge decides whether or not there is probable cause for a case to proceed to trial, Tesla engineer Eloy Rubio-Blanco testified that Riad had engaged the car’s “Autopilot” function about 20 minutes before the crash. The feature is akin to a sophisticated version of cruise control. The car will maintain a certain speed, set by the driver, unless it detects a car in front of it; when it does, it slows down to match the speed of that car, following at a distance set by the Tesla’s driver. It also automatically steers the car to stay in the center of the lane. Drivers using the Autopilot mode are given a series of warnings, by the car, if their hands ever leave the steering wheel.
Rubio-Blanco, who examined diagnostic data in Riad’s car after the crash, told the court that Riad’s hands had been on the car’s steering wheel, which means he was not warned. Riad had initially set his car’s speed to 77 mph; he then set it to 78 mph, and then finally changed the speed to 75 mph. At the time of the crash, the car was going approximately 74 mph.
Riad was driving on the 91 freeway, heading west into Gardena. The freeway empties out into Artesia Boulevard at Vermont, but Riad, seemingly unaware of that transition, did not appear to react — and neither did his Tesla. Rubio-Blanco said there was no indication Riad hit the brakes or turned the steering wheel, even as his car hurtled into Lopez’s vehicle.
Police officer Melissa Podany testified she had viewed security camera footage from a gas station showing the intersection and said it showed three cars turning left from Vermont in order to get on the 91 freeway heading east. The fourth car, she said, was Lopez’s Honda Civic.
There was no direct evidence that Riad’s car ran a red light. But Podany cited a witness she spoke with that said the light was in fact red.
“When you’re behind the wheel of a car, it is incumbent upon you to pay attention,” said Chase. Referring to Riad, she said, “He didn’t brake. He did nothing. He clearly had a reckless disregard for people on the road that day.”
Riad’s attorney Arthur Barens called no witnesses. He argued that Riad’s actions — driving 74 mph on a surface street — did not rise to “gross negligence” and should not be considered a felony. Were it not for the crash, he said, “we all know they would give him a ticket.” He noted the lack of evidence Riad ran a red light, and said the gas station video footage given to him to view was actually Podany’s body camera footage — essentially a video of a video — and far to blurry to discern anything meaningful about the nature of the collision. He also pointed out that toxicology results showed that Riad had not been drinking or taking drugs that night.
“The outcome in this case is dreadful,” he said. But the question. he said, is “what do we do with this young man,” adding: “I don’t agree that the evidence shows a felony took place.”
Judge Teresa Magno said she thought there was enough evidence to go forward with the case, and ordered Riad to be arraigned in June. After the proceedings, she asked Chase if she had made an “offer” to Riad — meaning a plea agreement offer. Chase said they “hadn’t gotten that far yet.”
The families of both victims have filed separate lawsuits against Riad and Tesla in Los Angeles County Superior Court. According to one of the complaints, Riad had been cited at least six times for moving violations in the three years before the crash.

Follow @hillelaron
Categories /

Consumers
,

Criminal
,

Technology
Subscribe to our free newsletters
Our weekly newsletter
Closing Arguments
offers the latest about ongoing
trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world,
while the monthly
Under the Lights
dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood,
sports, Big Tech and the arts.
About Us
/
Masthead
/
Subscriber Support
/
Connect with us on our social channels:

© 2025, Courthouse News Service
Terms of Use
•

Privacy Policy
•

Cookie Preferences
Loading...
Privacy Preference Center
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Preferences

Preferences

The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Performance Cookies

Performance Cookies

The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.

The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing

Marketing

The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options

Manage services

Manage {vendor_count} vendors

Read more about these purposes
Accept All Cookies

Reject All

Cookie Settings

Confirm My Choices

Cookie Settings
{title}

{title}

{title}
Privacy Preference Center
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Preferences

Preferences

The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Performance Cookies

Performance Cookies

The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.

The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing

Marketing

The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options

Manage services

Manage {vendor_count} vendors

Read more about these purposes
Accept

Reject All

Cookie Settings

Confirm My Choices

Cookie Settings
{title}

{title}

{title}
Manage consent

Manage consent
</reference>

<statements>
1. The legal boundary between machine intervention and personal criminal culpability was tested in People v. Kevin George Aziz Riad (Los Angeles County Superior Court, 2019–2023)
2. Riad's defense counsel argued that the driver relied on the vehicle's automated driver-assist system, which unexpectedly failed to slow down or navigate the exit ramp, negating the gross negligence required for a felony conviction
3. The court rejected this argument, ruling that the operation of an SAE Level 2 driver assistance system does not relieve the human operator of the statutory duty to control the vehicle and obey traffic laws
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.