You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
Effects of long-term magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers: A randomized controlled trial in overweight/obese adults | Scientific Reports

Long-term magnesium supplementation improves arterial stiffness, a cardiovascular disease risk marker. Effects on endothelial function may be another mechanism whereby increased magnesium intakes affect cardiovascular risk. Therefore, a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to examine effects of magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers. Fifty-two overweight and obese subjects (30 men and 22 women, age 62 ± 6 years) were randomized to receive either three times daily magnesium (total dose: 350 mg) or placebo capsules. Endothelial function was assessed at the start and at the end of the study. Cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline, after 12 weeks, and at week 24. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation did not change following long-term magnesium supplementation (0.49 pp; 95% CI: −0.38 to 1.36 pp; P = 0.26). Changes in reactive hyperemia index, retinal microvascular caliber and plasma markers for microvascular endothelial function (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1 and sE-selectin) were also not different. In addition, no effects on serum lipids, plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity, and low-grade systemic inflammation were observed. In conclusion, a daily magnesium supplement of 350 mg for 24 weeks does not improve endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults.

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.

Advertisement

View all journals

Saved research

Search

Log in

Content

Explore content

About
the journal

Publish
with us

Sign up for alerts

RSS feed

nature

scientific reports

articles

article

Effects of long-term magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers: A randomized controlled trial in overweight/obese adults

Download PDF

Download PDF

Article

Open access

Published:
07 March 2017

Effects of long-term magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers: A randomized controlled trial in overweight/obese adults

Peter J. Joris
1
,
2
,
Jogchum Plat
1
,
Stephan J. L. Bakker
3
&
…
Ronald P. Mensink
1
,
2

Show authors

Scientific Reports

volume
7
, Article number:
106
(
2017
)
Cite this article

Save article

View saved research

9059
Accesses

39
Citations

14
Altmetric

Metrics
details

Abstract
Long-term magnesium supplementation improves arterial stiffness, a cardiovascular disease risk marker. Effects on endothelial function may be another mechanism whereby increased magnesium intakes affect cardiovascular risk. Therefore, a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to examine effects of magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers. Fifty-two overweight and obese subjects (30 men and 22 women, age 62 ± 6 years) were randomized to receive either three times daily magnesium (total dose: 350 mg) or placebo capsules. Endothelial function was assessed at the start and at the end of the study. Cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline, after 12 weeks, and at week 24. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation did not change following long-term magnesium supplementation (0.49
pp
; 95% CI: −0.38 to 1.36
pp
;
P
= 0.26). Changes in reactive hyperemia index, retinal microvascular caliber and plasma markers for microvascular endothelial function (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1 and sE-selectin) were also not different. In addition, no effects on serum lipids, plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity, and low-grade systemic inflammation were observed. In conclusion, a daily magnesium supplement of 350 mg for 24 weeks does not improve endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effect of oral magnesium supplement on cardiometabolic markers in people with prediabetes: a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Article

Open access

28 October 2022

Modelling the effects of elevated methylglyoxal levels on vascular and metabolic complications

Article

Open access

19 February 2025

Development and validation of a cardiometabolic multimorbidity prediction model in middle-aged and older adults

Article

Open access

12 March 2026

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news in related subjects.

Cardiovascular diseases

Nutrition

Nutritional supplements

Obesity

Randomized controlled trials

Introduction
Prospective cohort studies have not only found an inverse association between dietary magnesium intake and diabetes
1
, but also with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk
2
,
3
. However, the number of well-designed intervention trials to examine a potential causal role of magnesium intake in the prevention of CVD is very limited. Recently, we have reported that in overweight and obese adults magnesium supplementation for 24 weeks resulted in a clinically relevant reduction in arterial stiffness, suggesting a potential mechanism by which dietary magnesium affects cardiovascular health
4
. Effects on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers, which were secondary outcomes of the study, were however not reported. Conventional cardiometabolic risk markers are known determinants of arterial stiffness
5
and the vascular endothelium has also been suggested to play an important role in arterial stiffening
6
. Reported effects of magnesium intake on serum lipids, plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity and low-grade systemic inflammation are inconsistent
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
, while only a few well-controlled intervention studies have examined effects on endothelial function. These trials involved patients taking anti-hypertensive drugs or medication known to affect lipid or glucose metabolism
12
,
13
, which may have masked effects of oral magnesium supplementation, and only used markers reflecting large artery (i.e. the brachial artery) endothelial function
11
,
12
,
13
.
Endothelial function can be assessed in different ways. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an ultrasound measurement of a large peripheral muscular artery, is considered the current non-invasive gold standard technique
14
. The change in pulse wave amplitude in response to blood flow-induced increases in shear stress is another functional marker of endothelial function, defined as the reactive hyperemia index (RHI). RHI reflects small artery reactivity
15
, while microvascular endothelial function can be assessed by measuring plasma markers that are synthesized by activation of the endothelium
16
. As these markers also relate to CVD risk
17
, effects on endothelial function of an increased magnesium intake were also assessed in our 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial. The study involved overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults, because they are expected to have an impaired endothelial function
18
and cardiometabolic disturbances at the start of the trial
19
, allowing for improvement by the intervention.
Results
Study subjects and compliance
The flow of participants through the study is shown in Supplemental Figure
1
. A total of 51 subjects (29 men and 22 women) completed the trial. Baseline characteristics of these participants have been described before
4
. In brief, subjects were on average 62 ± 6 years old and their average BMI was 29.6 ± 2.8 kg/m
2
. Serum magnesium concentrations tended to increase in the magnesium compared with the placebo group by 0.02 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.04 mmol/L;
P
= 0.09) after 24 weeks, while twenty-four hour urinary magnesium excretion increased significantly by 2.01 mmol (95% CI: 1.22 to 2.93 mmol;
P
< 0.001) (Table
1
). All subjects from the magnesium group had increased 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion concentrations at the end of the trial. This indicates that compliance of the subjects was excellent, as also evidenced from capsule counts. In fact, based on returned capsules, compliance ranged between 86% and 102%, and was on average >98% for the two treatment groups. No serious adverse events were reported in study diaries. Also, none of the participants has recorded in their study diaries any use of laxatives, which may contain magnesium oxide.
Table 1 Magnesium concentrations and vascular function measurements at baseline, and after a 12-week and 24-week magnesium or placebo treatment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults
1
.
Full size table

Vascular function markers
After 24 weeks of supplementation, changes in baseline brachial artery diameters were not statistically different between the two treatment groups (Table
1
). Also, FMD did not change (Fig.
1
). In addition, no effects of long-term magnesium supplementation on the RHI were found. Finally, the central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE), central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE) and the retinal arteriolar-to-venular diameter ratio (AVR) did not change following long-term magnesium supplementation. Table
1
shows effects on plasma markers for microvascular endothelial function. No differences in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM)-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1 and soluble endothelial selectin (sE-selectin) concentrations were observed.
Figure 1
Full size image
Individual changes in flow-mediated vasodilation. Effects of 24-week magnesium (black) and placebo supplementation (grey) on brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation in overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults.

Cardiometabolic risk markers
Fasting total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol, non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), glucose, insulin and HOMA
IR
did not differ after oral magnesium supplementation compared with the placebo treatment. The effects on plasma markers for low-grade systemic inflammation were also investigated. No effects were found on interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) (Table
2
). One man from the magnesium and four participants from the placebo group had CRP concentrations above 10 μg/mL on one (i.e. three CRP values at the start of the study and one at the end of the placebo treatment) or both occasions. Conclusions did not change when these participants were excluded form the statistical analyses (data not shown).
Table 2 Cardiometabolic risk measurements at baseline, and after a 12-week and 24-week magnesium or placebo treatment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults
1
.
Full size table

Discussion
In this randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving overweight and obese middle-aged and elderly adults, we found no significant effect on FMD, RHI, retinal microvascular caliber and plasma markers for microvascular endothelial function after 24 weeks of daily supplementation with 350 mg magnesium. Also, cardiometabolic risk markers did not change following magnesium supplementation.
The lack of effect on FMD is in agreement with several
11
,
12
, but not all
13
, earlier randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trials examining effects of magnesium supplementation. In a 6-month study in 50 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), a daily magnesium supplement of 365 mg increased FMD by 11.1
pp

13
. The observed improvement by Shechter
et al
.
13
is very pronounced and related with an estimated decrease of approximately 90% in the long-term risk to develop CVD
20
. In retrospect, we had a statistical power of 80% (
P
< 0.05) to detect a true change in FMD of at least 1.30
pp
. Thus, our study was certainly adequately powered to detect such a huge effect. Differences in subject characteristics may have contributed to these inconsistent results. CAD may be associated with magnesium depletion
21
and a magnesium-deficient state was indeed found in 36 of the 50 CAD patients
13
. Also, study participants had low intracellular magnesium concentrations, as assessed in sublingual epithelial cells. In our intervention trial and others involving also apparently healthy individuals
11
or patients on hemodialysis
12
, participants had baseline serum magnesium concentrations within normal ranges. This suggests that a very specific population was studied by Shechter
13
.
Baseline diameters of the brachial artery did not change in our study. Consequently, changes in brachial diameters cannot explain our lack of effect on FMD. Also, no effects were found on the RHI. The RHI reflects small artery reactivity
15
, while FMD targets a large peripheral muscular artery
14
. To date, no other RCT has addressed the effect of magnesium supplementation on the RHI. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that improvements in endothelial function have contributed to the beneficial effects on arterial stiffness associated with an increased magnesium intake for a 24-week experimental period, as reported previously
4
. As discussed
4
, long-term magnesium supplementation may primarily have an impact on the aorta and not on peripheral muscular arteries, possibly as a result of improvements in the structural characteristics of large elastic arterial walls. In fact, longer-term use of magnesium in patients receiving hemodialysis significantly decreased common carotid artery intima-media thickness
12
,
22
, which reflects structural changes of the arterial wall
23
, without any apparent effects on FMD
12
.
Magnesium supplementation did also not affect retinal microvascular caliber. To the best of our knowledge, no other RCTs have assessed the effects of magnesium on microvascular diameters. Finally, markers for microvascular endothelial function were investigated in plasma, but no significant effects were observed for sVCAM-1, sICAM-1 and sE-selectin that are involved in the recruitment of leukocytes to the vascular wall
24
. In agreement, Chacko
et al
. observed that a daily magnesium supplement of 500 mg for four weeks did not change plasma concentrations of these markers in 14 otherwise healthy overweight individuals
10
.
Alternate possible mechanisms to explain the beneficial effects of oral magnesium supplementation on arterial stiffness in overweight and obese adults
4
may relate to the postulated actions of magnesium on blood pressure and other cardiometabolic risk markers
25
. However, we have already reported that blood pressure did not change
4
, while serum lipids and lipoproteins, plasma glucose, insulin sensitivity and plasma markers for low-grade systemic inflammation were also comparable between the two treatment groups. A meta-analysis of nine RCTs involving patients with type II diabetes reported that magnesium supplementation (median daily dose: 360 mg) for 4 to 16 weeks increased HDL-cholesterol, but found no effects on total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations
26
. In healthy subjects, however, there is no evidence that an increased dietary magnesium intake improves the serum lipid profile
9
,
10
,
11
. A recent meta-analysis and systematic review of 21 randomized trials summarized the effects of magnesium supplements (range: 300 to 600 mg/day) on glucose, insulin and HOMA
IR
in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals
27
. Study duration ranged from one to six months. In agreement, no effects were observed on fasting glucose and insulin. However, the HOMA
IR
significantly decreased suggesting that insulin sensitivity improved following oral magnesium supplementation. These effects were more pronounced in individuals with hypomagnesemia as compared with normomagnesemic subjects, but did not depend on the presence of diabetes. Adults who completed the present trial had serum magnesium concentrations within normal range
28
, which may explain the lack of effect on the HOMA
IR
. Finally, no beneficial effects on pro-inflammatory cytokines were found. Similar conclusions were drawn in the very few RCTs that examined effects of magnesium supplementation on systemic inflammation in apparently healthy overweight adults
10
,
29
.
Some limitations of the present trial warrant consideration. Our study was sufficiently powered to detect a change of 1.30
pp
in FMD, while we estimated an effect of 0.49
pp
(95% CI: −0.38 to 1.36
pp
). Although the variability in our study was in line with findings of earlier studies
30
, we cannot exclude the possibility of false-negative finding. However, other markers of endothelial function did also not change and we therefore do no consider it very likely that oral magnesium supplementation improves endothelial function. Studies on underlying mechanisms are also needed, as the observed beneficial effects on large elastic arterial walls
4
may relate to the postulated actions of magnesium on endothelial cells
31
. In fact,
in vitro
studies have shown that low extracellular magnesium induces the development of a pro-atherosclerotic phenotype of cultured endothelial cells
32
. Recent studies also suggest an important role of microRNAs on vascular function
33
and the ability of endothelial cells to produce atherogenic catecholamines
34
. Broadening our knowledge in these novel fields will contribute to our understanding of mechanisms by which an increased oral magnesium intake beneficially affects cardiovascular health outcomes.
In conclusion, the present results indicate that a magnesium intervention for 24 weeks does not improve endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers in overweight and obese men and postmenopausal women. It is therefore unlikely that effects on endothelial function have contributed to the beneficial effects on arterial stiffness.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects and study design
Overweight and slightly obese men and postmenopausal women with a mean age of 62 ± 6 years participated in a randomized, double-bind, placebo-controlled, parallel study with a 24-week experimental period, as described previously
4
. In brief, study subjects were allocated to receive either three times daily magnesium (total dose: 350 mg; Magnesium Citrate Complex [Mg 16%]) or placebo capsules containing starch (Amylum Solani). A total daily dose of 350 mg is considered the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of supplemental magnesium for adults
35
. All capsules were kindly provided by Laboratorium Medisan B.V. (Heerenveen, The Netherlands). The capsules were prepared in one batch. Participants maintained their habitual diet, physical activity levels and consumption of alcohol throughout the total study period. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described before
4
. Briefly, all volunteers were apparently healthy and did not receive proton pump inhibitors, anti-hypertensive medication or drugs known to affect lipid or glucose metabolism. Fifty-two overweight and obese study subjects were included. They had a BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m
2
; serum creatinine concentrations <116 μmol/L for men and <101 μmol/L for women; and no indications for treatment with cholesterol-lowering medications
36
. All study participants gave written informed consent before the start of the trial. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center, and registered on 8 September 2014 at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02235805. The methods were performed in accordance with the described procedures in the approved study protocol.
Blood sampling and analyses
Fasting blood samples were taken at the start of the study (days −3 and 0), at week 12 (day 84), and at the end of the study (days 165 and 168) from a forearm vein by venipuncture. On the days preceding blood sampling, participants were requested not to consume alcohol or to perform any strenuous physical exercise. On the morning of blood sampling, subjects arrived after an overnight fast (no food or drink after 08.00 PM, except for water) at the Metabolic Research Unit Maastricht (MRUM) research facilities by public transport or by car to the standardize measurements as much as possible. After blood sampling, NaF-containing vacutainer tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lanes, NY, USA) and EDTA-coated vacutainer tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company) were immediately kept on ice and centrifuged within 30 minutes. To obtain plasma, plasma separator tubes were centrifuged at 1300×
g
for 15 minutes at 4 °C. Blood drawn in vacutainer serum tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company) was first allowed to clot for at least 30 minutes at 21 °C. To obtain serum, serum separator tubes were centrifuged at 1300×
g
for 15 minutes at 21 °C. Following centrifugation, plasma and serum samples were immediately portioned into aliquots and stored at −80 °C until analysis at the end of the trial.
Fasting glucose (Horiba ABX SAS, Montpellier, France) and NEFA concentrations (NEFA kit; WAKO Chemicals GmbH, Neuss, Germany) were measured in NaF-plasma. Fasting serum samples were analyzed for total cholesterol (Cobas 8000; Roche Diagnostics Systems, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Mannheim, Germany), HDL-cholesterol (Cobas 8000; Roche Diagnostics Systems), triacylglycerol (Cobas 8000; Roche Diagnostics Systems), and insulin concentrations (RIA; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). LDL-cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula
37
. The degree of insulin resistance was estimated by calculating the HOMA
IR

38
. Fasting EDTA-plasma samples were analyzed for markers for low-grade systemic inflammation (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, CRP, SAA) and markers for microvascular endothelial function (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, sE-selectin) by using a multi-array detection system based on electro-chemiluminescence technology (SECTOR Imager 2400; Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD, USA)
39
.
Vascular function measurements
Measurements were performed at the start of the trial (day 0), at week 12 (day 84), and at the end of the study (day 168) in a quiet and darkened room. The room was temperature controlled at 22 °C. After blood sampling and an acclimatization period of 30 minutes in the supine position, measurements were performed.
FMD was assessed using ultrasound echography (SONOS 5500; Hewlett-Packard [Philips], Andover, MA, USA) and recording of echo images on DVD
40
. After a 5-minute reference period, the pneumatic cuff placed around the participant's forearm was inflated to 250 mmHg for 5 minutes, causing distal hypoxia. Upon cuff-release reactive hyperemia ensued. The echo images were analyzed offline using a custom-written Matlab program (MyFMD V14.07; Prof. A.P. Hoeks, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The FMD response was quantified as the maximal percentage change in post occlusion arterial diameter relative to baseline diameter. During FMD measurements, the Endo-PAT 2000 (Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) was used to measure changes in pulse wave amplitude in response to reactive hyperemia. In brief, a pneumatic probe was placed on the index finger of both hands to record the peripheral arterial tone, according to instructions of the manufacturer. The RHI was quantified as the post-to-pre occlusion peripheral arterial tone signal ratio in the occluded hand, normalized to values in the control hand and then further corrected for baseline vascular tone
41
. Finally, retinal vascular images were obtained to assess microvascular diameters in the eye. During this test, study participants were seated with their head resting on a chinrest, looking directly into the non-mydriatic retinal camera (Topcon TRC-NW-300; Topcon Co., Tokyo, Japan). The camera focused on the optic disc and photographed the retina. Images were digitized and analyzed to calculate the CRAE, CRVE, and retinal AVR with appropriate software (Generalized Dual-Bootstrap Iterative Closest Point [GDBP-ICP])
42
. In brief, the software automatically aligns the retinal images based on detected vascular centerlines by iteratively transforming the algorithm. At least two arteriolar and two venular retinal segments were measured and summarized by using the Parr-Hubbard formulas
43
. These segments had to be the same segments at each time point for an individual.
Statistical analyses
Study results are presented as means ± SDs, unless otherwise indicated. A per protocol analysis was performed. Differences in baseline values between the magnesium and placebo group were tested using an unpaired Student's
t
test. A one-way ANCOVA, using the baseline measurements of the outcome variables as covariates, was conducted to investigate differences in responses between magnesium and placebo treatments. When residuals were not normally distributed as assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, a Wilcoxon rank-sum was used. Changes were then calculated for each individual as the difference between the values at the end of the trial and at the start of the trial. A
P

<
0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was powered on carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity, which was the primary outcome, but a retrospective power analysis showed that with 51 participants we had 80% power to detect a true change in FMD of at least 1.30
pp
. For this power calculation, an alpha of 0.05 and observed within-subject variability in FMD of 1.64
pp
were used. Analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Incorporated, Chicago, IL, USA).

References
Fang, X.
et al.
Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
BMC Med.

14
, 210 (2016).
Article

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Del Gobbo, L. C.
et al.
Circulating and dietary magnesium and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

98
, 160–173 (2013).
Article

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Joosten, M. M.
et al.
Urinary and plasma magnesium and risk of ischemic heart disease.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

97
, 1299–1306 (2013).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Joris, P. J., Plat, J., Bakker, S. J. & Mensink, R. P. Long-term magnesium supplementation improves arterial stiffness in overweight and obese adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

103
, 1260–1266 (2016).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Laurent, S.
et al.
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications.
Eur. Heart J.

27
, 2588–2605 (2006).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Wilkinson, I. B.
et al.
Nitric oxide regulates local arterial distensibility
in vivo
.
Circulation

105
, 213–217 (2002).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Guerrero-Romero, F.
et al.
Oral magnesium supplementation improves insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Diabetes Metab.

30
, 253–258 (2004).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Paolisso, G.
et al.
Daily magnesium supplements improve glucose handling in elderly subjects.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

55
, 1161–1167 (1992).
CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Marken, P. A.
et al.
Effects of magnesium oxide on the lipid profile of healthy volunteers.
Atherosclerosis

77
, 37–42 (1989).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Chacko, S. A.
et al.
Magnesium supplementation, metabolic and inflammatory markers, and global genomic and proteomic profiling: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial in overweight individuals.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

93
, 463–473 (2011).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Cosaro, E.
et al.
Effects of magnesium supplements on blood pressure, endothelial function and metabolic parameters in healthy young men with a family history of metabolic syndrome.
Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.

24
, 1213–1220 (2014).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Mortazavi, M.
et al.
Effect of magnesium supplementation on carotid intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilatation among hemodialysis patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Eur. Neurol.

69
, 309–316 (2013).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Shechter, M.
et al.
Oral magnesium therapy improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease.
Circulation

102
, 2353–2358 (2000).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Ellins, E. A. & Halcox, J. P. Where are we heading with noninvasive clinical vascular physiology? Why and how should we assess endothelial function?
Cardiol. Res. Pract

2011
, 870132 (2011).
PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Poredos, P. & Jezovnik, M. K. Testing endothelial function and its clinical relevance.
J. Atheroscler. Thromb

20
, 1–8 (2013).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Deanfield, J. E., Halcox, J. P. & Rabelink, T. J. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance.
Circulation

115
, 1285–1295 (2007).
PubMed

Google Scholar

Cohn, J. N., Quyyumi, A. A., Hollenberg, N. K. & Jamerson, K. A. Surrogate markers for cardiovascular disease: functional markers.
Circulation

109
, IV31–IV46 (2004).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Beijers, H. J.
et al.
Higher central fat mass and lower peripheral lean mass are independent determinants of endothelial dysfunction in the elderly: the Hoorn study.
Atherosclerosis

233
, 310–318 (2014).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Despres, J. P. & Lemieux, I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome.
Nature

444
, 881–887 (2006).
Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Ras, R. T., Streppel, M. T., Draijer, R. & Zock, P. L. Flow-mediated dilation and cardiovascular risk prediction: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Int. J. Cardiol.

168
, 344–351 (2013).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Seelig, M. Cardiovascular consequences of magnesium deficiency and loss: pathogenesis, prevalence and manifestations-magnesium and chloride loss in refractory potassium repletion.
Am. J. Cardiol.

63
, 4G–21G (1989).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Turgut, F.
et al.
Magnesium supplementation helps to improve carotid intima media thickness in patients on hemodialysis.
Int. Urol. Nephrol.

40
, 1075–1082 (2008).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Lorenz, M. W.
et al.
Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Circulation

115
, 459–467 (2007).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Calder, P. C.
et al.
A consideration of biomarkers to be used for evaluation of inflammation in human nutritional studies.
Br. J. Nutr.

109
, S1–S34 (2013).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Cunha, A. R., Umbelino, B., Correia, M. L. & Neves, M. F. Magnesium and vascular changes in hypertension.
Int. J. Hypertens.

2012
, 754250 (2012).
Article

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Song, Y., He, K., Levitan, E. B., Manson, J. E. & Liu, S. Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials.
Diabet. Med

23
, 1050–1056 (2006).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Simental-Mendia, L. E., Sahebkar, A., Rodriguez-Moran, M. & Guerrero-Romero, F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effects of magnesium supplementation on insulin sensitivity and glucose control.
Pharmacol. Res.

111
, 272–282 (2016).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Heil, W. & Ehrhardt, V. Reference ranges for adults and children. Pre-analytical considerations in
Roche Diagnostics 9th Edition
(2008).
Moslehi, N., Vafa, M., Rahimi-Foroushani, A. & Golestan, B. Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on inflammatory markers in middle-aged overweight women.
J. Res. Med. Sci.

17
, 607–614 (2012).
PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

van Mil, A. C.
et al.
Impact of volunteer-related and methodology-related factors on the reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation: analysis of 672 individual repeated measurements.
J. Hypertens.

34
, 1738–1745 (2016).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Maier, J. A., Malpuech-Brugère, C., Zimowska, W., Rayssiguier, Y. & Mazur, A. Low magnesium promotes endothelial cell dysfunction: implications for atherosclerosis, inflammation and trombosis.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta.

1689
, 13–21 (2004).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Maier, J. A. Endothelial cells and magnesium: implications in atherosclerosis.
Clin. Sci. (Lond.)

122
, 397–407 (2012).
Article

CAS

Google Scholar

Santulli, G. MicroRNAs and Endothelial (Dys) Function.
J. Cell Physiol.

231
, 1638–1644 (2016).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Sorriento, D.
et al.
Endothelial cells are able to synthesize and release catecholamines both
in vitro
and
in vivo
.
Hypertension

60
, 129–136 (2012).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine (US). Dietary reference intakes: calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride In
The National Academies
, 190–249 (1997).
van Dis, L., Geleijnse, J. M., Verschuren, W. M. & Kromhout, D. Cardiovascular risk management of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands: from unifactorial to multifactorial approach.
Neth. Heart J.

20
, 320–325 (2012).
Article

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I. & Fredrickson, D. S. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.
Clin. Chem.

8
, 499–502 (1972).

Google Scholar

Matthews, D. R.
et al.
Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.
Diabetologia

28
, 412–419 (1985).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Stam, F.
et al.
Impaired renal function is associated with markers of endothelial dysfunction and increased inflammatory activity.
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.

18
, 892–898 (2003).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Corretti, M. C.
et al.
Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

39
, 257–265 (2002).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Axtell, A. L., Gomari, F. A. & Cooke, J. P. Assessing endothelial vasodilator function with the Endo-PAT 2000.
J. Vis. Exp.

44
, e2167 (2010).

Google Scholar

Stewart, C. V., Tsai, C. L. & Roysam, B. The dual-bootstrap iterative closest point algorithm with application to retinal image registration.
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

22
, 1379–1394 (2003).
Article

PubMed

Google Scholar

Hubbard, L. D.
et al.
Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
Ophthalmology

106
, 2269–2280 (1999).
Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Download references
Acknowledgements
The present study is funded by research grant CH001 from Top Institute of Food and Nutrition (TIFN), a public-private partnership on precompetitive research in food and nutrition. The public partners are responsible for the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. The private partners have contributed to the project through regular discussion. We thank D. Luiten and C. Op’t Eyndt for dietary assistance, and M. Hulsbosch for technical support. Finally, we thank our volunteers for their enthusiasm and cooperation. Supported by research grant CH001 from Top Institute of Food and Nutrition (TIFN), a public-private partnership on precompetitive research in food and nutrition. Capsules were provided by Laboratorium Medisan B.V. (Heerenveen, The Netherlands).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands
Peter J. Joris, Jogchum Plat & Ronald P. Mensink
The Top Institute of Food and Nutrition (TIFN), Wageningen, 6709, PA, The Netherlands
Peter J. Joris & Ronald P. Mensink
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713, GZ, The Netherlands
Stephan J. L. Bakker
Authors
Peter J. Joris
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed

Google Scholar
Jogchum Plat
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed

Google Scholar
Stephan J. L. Bakker
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed

Google Scholar
Ronald P. Mensink
View author publications
Search author on:
PubMed

Google Scholar
Contributions
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows; P.J.J.: designed and conducted the trial, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript; J.P.: interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; S.J.L.B.: interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; and R.P.M.: designed the trial, interpreted the data, had overall responsibility for the study, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to

Peter J. Joris
.
Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note:
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information (download DOC
)
Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joris, P.J., Plat, J., Bakker, S.J.L.
et al.
Effects of long-term magnesium supplementation on endothelial function and cardiometabolic risk markers: A randomized controlled trial in overweight/obese adults.

Sci Rep

7
, 106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00205-9
Download citation
Received
:
21 November 2016
Accepted
:
14 February 2017
Published
:
07 March 2017
DOI
:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00205-9
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy shareable link to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

Research articles

News & Comment

Collections

Subjects

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on X

Sign up for alerts

RSS feed

About the journal

About Scientific Reports

Contact

Journal policies

Guide to referees

Calls for Papers

Editor's Choice

Journal highlights

Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

For authors

Language editing services

Open access funding

Submit manuscript

Search

Search articles by subject, keyword or author

Show results from

All journals

This journal

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Explore articles by subject

Find a job

Guide to authors

Editorial policies

Scientific Reports

(
Sci Rep
)

ISSN

2045-2322
(online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

About us

Press releases

Press office

Contact us

Discover content

Journals A-Z

Articles by subject

protocols.io

Nature Index

Publishing policies

Nature portfolio policies

Open access

Author & Researcher services

Reprints & permissions

Research data

Language editing

Scientific editing

Nature Masterclasses

Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

Librarian service & tools

Librarian portal

Open research

Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

Advertising

Partnerships & Services

Media kits

Branded
content

Professional development

Nature Awards

Nature Careers

Nature

Conferences

Regional websites

Nature Africa

Nature China

Nature India

Nature Japan

Nature Middle East

Privacy
Policy

Use
of cookies

Your privacy choices/Manage cookies

Legal
notice

Accessibility
statement

Terms & Conditions

Your US state privacy rights

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Close

Sign up for the
Nature Briefing
newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Email address

Sign up

I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the
Nature
and Springer Nature Limited
Privacy Policy
.

Close

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.

Sign up for Nature Briefing
</reference>

<statements>
1. In overweight and obese adults, a separate trial with the same dose (350 mg/day) found that magnesium supplementation did not improve endothelial function (assessed by flow-mediated dilation) or a range of cardiometabolic risk markers, despite previously documented effects on arterial stiffness.
2. Magnesium, zinc, and selenium supplements are widely available, inexpensive, and have been used in many trials, demonstrating practical feasibility for chronic administration. Adherence is generally good, although gastrointestinal side effects (especially with magnesium) can limit tolerability.
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.