You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
Why Wrong Information Is Worse Than No Information | Psychology Today

Misinformation exploits our inherent desire for certainty, misguiding our beliefs and actions.

Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

Psychology Today

Search

Find a Therapist

Find a Therapist

Therapists

Therapists

Psychiatrists

Treatment Centers

Support Groups

x

Therapists:

Login

|

Sign Up & Get Listed

United States

Austin, TX

Brooklyn, NY

Chicago, IL

Denver, CO

Houston, TX

Los Angeles, CA

New York, NY

Portland, OR

San Diego, CA

San Francisco, CA

Seattle, WA

Washington, DC

Atlanta, GA

Sacramento, CA

Get Help

Mental Health

Addiction

Anxiety

ADHD

Asperger's

Autism

Bipolar Disorder

Chronic Pain

Depression

Eating Disorders

Personality

Passive Aggression

Personality

Shyness

Personal Growth

Goal Setting

Happiness

Positive Psychology

Stopping Smoking

Relationships

Low Sexual Desire

Relationships

Sex

Family Life

Child Development

Parenting

See All Help Topics

Do I Need Help?

Self Tests
NEW

Therapy Center

Student Resources

Clinical Terms

Types of Therapy

Talk to Someone

Find a Therapist

Find a Treatment Center

Find a Psychiatrist

Find a Support Group

Find Online Therapy

Magazine

Current

September 2026

The Power of Enough

We’re all holding onto something we’re sure we can’t give up on, but research shows that letting go can boost our happiness a lot more than we might think.

Subscribe

Recent

Issue Archive

Tests

Self Tests

Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.

Self Assessments

Autism Test

Borderline Personality Disorder Test

Depression Test

Emotional Intelligence Test

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Test

Introversion / Extroversion Test

Narcissism Test

OCD Test

Psychopathy Test

Self-Esteem Test

Sex Personality Test

Your Mental Health Today Test

See All Self Tests

Quizzes

Can You Burst a Bad Mood?

Can You Spot Dating Red Flags?

Can You Spot Defense Mechanisms?

Can You Spot Red Flags In A Relationship?

Do You Know What Makes People Happy?

Do You Know What the Different Intelligences Are?

Do You Still Believe These Myths About The Mind?

Do You Understand Human Nature?

False Memories/Mandela Effect Quiz

Psychopath vs. Sociopath Test

Verbal IQ Test

Which Jobs Attract "Dark" Personalities?

See All Quizzes

us

Search

Search

Search

Therapists

Therapists

Psychiatrists

Treatment Centers

Support Groups

x

Sam Goldstein Ph.D.

Common Sense Science

Social Learning Theory

Why Wrong Information Is Worse Than No Information

When knowing less means surviving.

Posted
July 22, 2025

|

Reviewed by Abigail Fagan

Share

Tweet

Share on Bluesky

Share

Email

Key points

False information takes advantage of evolutionary adaptations for social harmony.

Misinformation thrives by offering emotional certainty in times of uncertainty.

Beliefs associated with identity resist correction, even when they are incorrect.

In an age saturated with digital content, any form of information, whether accurate or not, is preferable to ignorance. However, from an evolutionary perspective, misinformation often poses greater risks than a lack of knowledge. The human brain, shaped by thousands of years of adaptation, is designed to navigate ambiguity through inference, social trust, and imitation. Ironically, the same instincts that once helped our ancestors survive, like trusting familiar voices and quickly sharing urgent news, now make us more vulnerable to the flood of false information around us. Misinformation warps how we see the world, leads us to make poor choices, and chips away at the trust and connection that hold our communities together.

Evolutionary Roots of Information Seeking

Survival in early human societies relied heavily on making quick, often life-saving decisions. Evolution fine-tuned our
neural
architecture to detect threats, recognize rewards, and follow trusted group members. According to arguments made by scholars in
evolutionary psychology
, false beliefs sometimes serve functional purposes by reinforcing group coordination and shared
identity
, even when the assumptions are inaccurate (Van Bavel, Reinero, & Harris, 2020). The cognitive cost of skepticism outweighed the risks of belief in closely knit groups.

Reliance on others for knowledge, social learning, or prestige
bias
has increased our dependence on secondhand information. This mechanism, which once accelerated learning in ancestral environments, has become problematic in a media-saturated world. Our brains are wired to trust information that's been endorsed by others, a shortcut that once helped our ancestors survive. Today, that same impulse fuels the lightning-fast spread of falsehoods across
social media
and messaging apps (Efstratiou & De Cristofaro, 2022). It is now all too easy for rumors and half-truths to ripple through our networks.

The Cost of Incorrect Information

Getting the facts right really matters—especially when our decisions and actions depend on them. When we don’t have enough information, it can feel like we know more than we actually do, leading us to hold onto false beliefs. That’s what makes misinformation so tricky. Unlike just not knowing, which can make us pause or ask questions, misinformation gives us a false sense of certainty. And that misplaced
confidence
can be seriously harmful, especially in areas like science communication and policymaking, where good decisions rely on solid evidence and expert advice. Erosion of epistemic trust, the shared foundation of knowledge systems, is a well-documented result of prolonged exposure to misinformation (O’Connor & Weatherall, 2019).

Beliefs grounded in misinformation also tend to become psychologically entrenched. Once internalized, they are supported by confirmation bias. People unconsciously prioritize information that reinforces existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence. Research in cognitive psychology indicates that such rigidity occurs not because of the credibility of misinformation, but due to its alignment with personal values or group identities (Pennycook & Rand, 2021). This alignment turns belief into an identity marker, rather than a cognitive stance.

Why We Seek Information and Why It May Mislead Us

Moments of uncertainty trigger a deep-seated drive in humans to seek explanations for these uncertainties. In evolutionary terms, this drive lessens ambiguity and enhances survival odds. When people feel scared and confused, they often cling to stories that tug at the heartstrings, even if those stories lack solid facts. What drives this is our need for cognitive closure. We would rather have a definite explanation, even if it is incorrect, than sit with uncertainty. The ache of not knowing pushes us to cling to neat, but false, narratives that make sense of the chaos (Szebeni, Lönnqvist, & Jasinskaja-Lahti, 2021).

Underlying this behavior is the concept of cognitive closure—the psychological preference for definite answers over open-ended uncertainty. The discomfort of not knowing compels people to adopt false explanations that provide narrative coherence. These explanations tend to spread faster than accurate ones because they are more emotionally satisfying and simpler to understand.

We are wired to spot intention everywhere, even when it is not there. Back in our hunter-gatherer days, hearing a rustle in the bushes and assuming "there is something out there" probably saved lives. Today, that same survival trick steers us straight into conspiracy theories, tricking us into reading secret agendas into everyday coincidences. What once protected us now fuels the perfect storm for misinformation.

Consequences for Thought and Action

When we buy into lies, it not only twists our thinking but also our feelings and choices. False stories spark
fear
, drive wedges between us, and push people into risky decisions. Think about it: rumors about rigged elections have shaken our faith in democracy, and baseless vaccine scares have put everyone's health on the line.

Social Learning Theory
Essential Reads

Why We Secretly Miss the Chaos We Say We Hate

Decency Is the Small Word That Holds a Big Country Together

Our need to belong makes these beliefs stick even more. When someone challenges our views, we often dig in rather than admitting we are wrong, to show we are on the same team. Research shows that sharing your group's beliefs provides comfort and a sense of belonging, making those ideas difficult to shake (Fasce & Adrián-Ventura, 2023).

Moreover, to make matters worse, our apps and platforms continue to feed us exactly what we already agree with. Misinformation does not just become a badge of belonging. The same tribal instincts that once helped our ancestors stick together now drive the fierce polarization and extremes we see today.

Why Clarity Matters More Than Certainty

Misinformation takes advantage of the way our brains are naturally wired. In the past, when survival depended on quick decisions, it made sense to trust the group, spot patterns fast, and stick to simple, clear stories. These mental shortcuts helped our ancestors stay safe in a world full of danger and uncertainty. Today, those same instincts can make us vulnerable to false information. We rely on mental shortcuts, or
heuristics
, not because they are perfectly accurate, but because they are fast and help keep us connected. Back in the day, when everyone in a tribe shared the same news around the fire, a few mistakes did not matter much, and sticking together was what counted. Today, though, those same shortcuts leave us wide open to constant trickery. Digital media, partisan polarization, and algorithmic echo chambers now weaponize these evolved tendencies.
Pattern recognition
becomes conspiracy theorizing, social trust turns into blind allegiance, and narrative-seeking evolves into the viral spread of falsehoods.

Misinformation does not just steer us wrong. It bends our reality, changing how we vote, take care of our health, react in emergencies, and see one another. Ignorance might make us curious or open-minded, but misinformation hardens into belief. Moreover, once a false idea takes root, it clings on. Confirmation bias,
motivated reasoning
, and our need to fit in with our peers all team up to keep it safe from questioning. This cognitive entrenchment misguides individuals and fragments society. When facts become negotiable and shared reality dissolves,
cooperation
on large-scale challenges such as
climate change
, public health, and political stability becomes nearly impossible.

The cost of false beliefs is no longer theoretical. It can be measured in lives, livelihoods, and lost trust. Although often more satisfying than falsehood, truth remains our most dependable guide to action.

Clarity as a Cognitive and Civic Imperative

Moving forward means choosing clear thinking over the comfort of being "sure." We need to recognize critical thinking, media literacy, and intellectual humility as everyday skills. Before you hit share, take a moment. Does that post tug at your heart or speak to your head? Where did it come from? When solid proof challenges your beliefs, update your views. Societies must invest in
education
systems that reward critical thinking and questioning over rote memorization. Likewise, institutions must rebuild trust by prioritizing transparency and accountability. In a world where misinformation spreads faster than truth, the courage to think slowly, embrace ambiguity, and prioritize clarity over emotional comfort may be our best defense.

References

Efstratiou, A., & De Cristofaro, E. (2022). Adherence to misinformation on social media through socio-cognitive and group-based processes.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6
(CSCW2), Article 3555589.

Fasce, A., & Adrián-Ventura, J. (2023). Science through a tribal lens: A group-based account of polarization over scientific facts.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26
(5), 857–874.

O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2019).
The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread
. Yale University Press.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25
(5), 388–402.

Szebeni, Z., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2021). Social psychological predictors of belief in fake news in the run-up to the 2019 Hungarian elections.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12
, 790848.

Van Bavel, J. J., Reinero, D. A., & Harris, E. (2020). Breaking groupthink: Why scientific identity and norms mitigate ideological epistemology.
Motivation and Emotion, 44
, 29–43.

More

references

Share this post

Facebook

Bluesky

Linkedin

Email

Don't miss an update! Get posts from Sam Goldstein Ph.D. direct to your inbox

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today
Terms & Conditions
and
Privacy Policy

advertisement

About the Author

Sam Goldstein, Ph.D.
, is an adjunct faculty member at the University of Utah School of Medicine and co-author of
Tenacity in Children.

Online:

Visit Dr. Sam Goldstein
,
Facebook
,
X
,
Bluesky
,
LinkedIn
,
Instagram
,
TikTok

More from Sam Goldstein Ph.D.

More from Psychology Today

advertisement

advertisement

Find a Therapist

Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.

City or Zip

Cities

Atlanta, GA

Austin, TX

Baltimore, MD

Boston, MA

Brooklyn, NY

Charlotte, NC

Chicago, IL

Columbus, OH

Dallas, TX

Denver, CO

Detroit, MI

Houston, TX

Indianapolis, IN

Jacksonville, FL

Las Vegas, NV

Los Angeles, CA

Louisville, KY

Memphis, TN

Miami, FL

Milwaukee, WI

Minneapolis, MN

Nashville, TN

New York, NY

Oakland, CA

Omaha, NE

Philadelphia, PA

Phoenix, AZ

Pittsburgh, PA

Portland, OR

Raleigh, NC

Sacramento, CA

Saint Louis, MO

San Antonio, TX

San Diego, CA

San Francisco, CA

San Jose, CA

Seattle, WA

Tucson, AZ

Washington, DC

Are you a Therapist?

Get Listed Today

More from Sam Goldstein Ph.D.

More from Psychology Today

Psychology Today

About & Policies

About

Editorial Process

Privacy

Terms

Accessibility

Do Not Sell Or Share My Personal Information

Get Help

Talk to Someone

Find a Therapist

Find a Treatment Center

Find a Psychiatrist

Find a Support Group

Find Online Therapy

United States

Subscribe Today

About & Policies

About

Editorial Process

Privacy

Terms

Accessibility

Do Not Sell Or Share My Personal Information

Get Help

Talk to Someone

Find a Therapist

Find a Treatment Center

Find a Psychiatrist

Find a Support Group

Find Online Therapy

United States

Psychology Today © 2026 Sussex Publishers, LLC

Back

Psychology Today

Home

Find a Therapist

Get Help

Magazine

Tests

Back

Find a Therapist

Get Help

Find a Therapist

Find a Treatment Center

Find a Psychiatrist

Find a Support Group

Find Online Therapy

Members

Login

Sign Up

United States

Austin, TX

Brooklyn, NY

Chicago, IL

Denver, CO

Houston, TX

Los Angeles, CA

New York, NY

Portland, OR

San Diego, CA

San Francisco, CA

Seattle, WA

Washington, DC

Back

Get Help

Mental Health

Addiction

Anxiety

ADHD

Asperger's

Autism

Bipolar Disorder

Chronic Pain

Depression

Eating Disorders

Personality

Passive Aggression

Personality

Shyness

Personal Growth

Goal Setting

Happiness

Positive Psychology

Stopping Smoking

Relationships

Low Sexual Desire

Relationships

Sex

Family Life

Child Development

Parenting

View Help Index

Do I Need Help?

Self Tests
NEW

Therapy Center

Student Resources

Clinical Terms

Types of Therapy

Talk to Someone

Find a Therapist

Find a Treatment Center

Find a Psychiatrist

Find a Support Group

Find Online Therapy

Back

Magazine

September 2026

The Power of Enough

We’re all holding onto something we’re sure we can’t give up on, but research shows that letting go can boost our happiness a lot more than we might think.

Subscribe

Issue Archive

Back

Tests

Self Tests

Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.

Self Assessments

Autism Test

Borderline Personality Disorder Test

Depression Test

Emotional Intelligence Test

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Test

Introversion / Extroversion Test

Narcissism Test

OCD Test

Psychopathy Test

Self-Esteem Test

Sex Personality Test

Your Mental Health Today Test

See All Self Tests

Quizzes

Can You Burst a Bad Mood?

Can You Spot Dating Red Flags?

Can You Spot Defense Mechanisms?

Can You Spot Red Flags In A Relationship?

Do You Know What Makes People Happy?

Do You Know What the Different Intelligences Are?

Do You Still Believe These Myths About The Mind?

Do You Understand Human Nature?

False Memories/Mandela Effect Quiz

Psychopath vs. Sociopath Test

Verbal IQ Test

Which Jobs Attract "Dark" Personalities?

See All Quizzes
</reference>

<statements>
1. The high-velocity, emotionally charged nature of contemporary digital media platforms constantly induces state closure demands, creating an optimal operational environment for the rapid diffusion and uncritical acceptance of misinformation.
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.