You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
Predicting Misinformation Beliefs Across Four Countries: The Role of Narcissism, Conspiracy Mentality, Social Trust, and Perceptions of Unsafe Neighborhoods| Journal of Social and Political Psychology



Quick jump to page content

Main Navigation

Main Content

Sidebar

Explore PsychOpen Journals

|

About PsychOpen

New submission

Register

Login

Home

About

Focus and Scope

Policies

Additional features

Privacy Statement

Articles

Current

Archives

Forthcoming

Special Thematic Sections

Open Science Practices

For Authors

Article Types

Peer Review

Author Guidelines

Submissions

Publication Process

Guidelines for Guest Editors

Team

Editors-in-Chief

Associate Editors

Editorial Board

Search

Return to Article Details

Download

Full-screen

Close full-screen

ISSN Online
: 2195-3325

Unless otherwise noted, site content is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (CC BY 4.0)

Partners & Responsibilities

Leibniz-Psychology

Legal Notice

Support Contact

PsychOpen Technical Support

support@jspp.psychopen.eu

Principal Contact

J. C. Cohrs, A. Figueiredo, I. E. Putra, J. R. Vollhardt

editors@jspp.psychopen.eu
</reference>

<statements>
1. High NFCC individuals prefer an invalid or faulty explanation over no explanation at all, choosing to rely on discredited misinformation during later inferential reasoning rather than tolerate an unresolved void in their situational comprehension.
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.