You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable



Access restricted
We've detected unusual activity from your network. Access to this page is temporarily restricted.
Are you a researcher?
Log in or sign up as a ResearchGate member to verify your access.
Log in
Create account
Ray ID: a3befc297db9e806
Client IP: 208.110.231.2
©
2008-2026
ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved.
</reference>

<statements>
1. Unlike general mental ability or cognitive sophistication, NFCC operates as a motivated epistemic orientation that governs how individuals seek, encode, evaluate, and maintain information.
2. The intensity of this epistemic motive reflects an economic balancing of cognitive trade-offs, determined by the perceived psychological costs of remaining in an open, undecided state compared to the subjective benefits of possessing stable, unshakeable knowledge.
3. These dimensional facets operate dynamically through two foundational phases: the urgency tendency and the permanence tendency.
4. The urgency tendency describes the pressing inclination to attain closure without delay, propelling the cognitive system to seize on the first accessible piece of information that resolves an open question.
5. The permanence tendency describes the subsequent drive to safeguard and freeze on that acquired judgment indefinitely, shielding cognitive closure against future disruption and preventing the distressing reopening of the issue.
6. The cognitive pathway linking high NFCC to misinformation vulnerability operates fundamentally through the seizing and freezing sequence.
7. To alleviate this psychological tension, the cognitive architecture prioritizes cognitive speed and finality over epistemic accuracy and systematic scrutiny.
8. The urgency drive compels the cognitive apparatus to seize upon these readily accessible, fluently processed narratives, preempting the patient search for alternative, more reliable explanations.
9. At this juncture, the individual freezes upon the newly adopted belief to preserve the acquired equilibrium.
10. To reopen the cognitive schema would entail plunging back into ambiguity, a state that high NFCC individuals actively avoid.
11. While low NFCC allows individuals to maintain open-ended hypotheses, tolerate interim uncertainty, and exhibit epistemic curiosity, high NFCC precipitates premature cognitive closure, sealing memory against corrective updating and cementing invalid assertions into long-term structures.
12. For an individual characterized by a high need for cognitive closure, an incomplete, fractured, or ambiguous mental model is cognitively intolerable.
13. The presence of an explanatory gap re-activates the urgency tendency, but because the retraction offers no alternative causal mechanism, the permanence tendency enforces reliance on the discredited initial misinformation.
14. Conversely, individuals low in NFCC demonstrate greater comfort with open-ended epistemic states, remaining capable of sustaining an incomplete model while suspending final judgment until verified facts emerge.
15. When individuals high in NFCC encounter ideologically congenial misinformation, the urgency tendency facilitates immediate endorsement, as congenial falsehoods produce immediate cognitive fluency and avoid cognitive dissonance.
16. Once accepted, the permanence tendency drives vigorous defensive processing.
17. NFCC is both an enduring dispositional trait and a fluctuating psychological state induced by situational stressors.
18. Environmental factors such as acute time constraints, task fatigue, excessive environmental noise, information overload, and macro-level crises (including geopolitical conflict, natural disasters, and viral outbreaks) substantially elevate state NFCC across populations.
19. In this depleted condition, the urgency tendency escalates sharply, forcing individuals to seize on intuitive heuristics, sensationalist claims, and simplistic narratives to attain psychological security.
20. NFCC does not reflect a selective attraction to falsity or irrationality; rather, it manifests as a fundamental intolerance of ambiguity and open-ended processing.
21. Once integrated into an individual's cognitive architecture, the permanence tendency locks the belief into place, driving the Continued Influence Effect whenever post-hoc retractions leave causal voids in an individual's mental model.
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.