You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing | Fortune

There’s a stark difference in success rates between companies that purchase AI tools from vendors and those that build them internally.

Search
Subscribe
Home
Latest
Fortune 500
Finance
Tech
Leadership
Lifestyle
Rankings
Multimedia
Trending
now
1
Former CIA official found with $40 million in gold bars for 'work-related expenses' reaches tentative plea deal
2
Trump’s tariffs slashed jobs and wage growth. Now companies are funneling $100 billion in refunds to supplement workers’ retirement
3
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg was fired after dedicating 15 years of his career to Salomon Brothers—the next morning, he founded his media empire
1
Former CIA official found with $40 million in gold bars for 'work-related expenses' reaches tentative plea deal
2
Trump’s tariffs slashed jobs and wage growth. Now companies are funneling $100 billion in refunds to supplement workers’ retirement
3
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg was fired after dedicating 15 years of his career to Salomon Brothers—the next morning, he founded his media empire
Newsletters
CFO Daily
MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing
By

Sheryl Estrada
Sheryl Estrada
Senior Writer and author of CFO Daily
By

Sheryl Estrada
Sheryl Estrada
Senior Writer and author of CFO Daily
August 18, 2025, 6:54 AM ET
Getty Images
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.
Add us on Google
Add us on Google
Good morning. Companies are betting on AI—yet nearly all enterprise pilots are stuck at the starting line.
Recommended Video

The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025
,
a new report
published by MIT’s
NANDA
initiative, reveals that while generative AI holds promise for enterprises, most initiatives to drive rapid revenue growth are falling flat.
Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L. The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.
To unpack these findings, I spoke with Aditya Challapally, the lead author of the report, and a research contributor to project NANDA at MIT.
“Some large companies’ pilots and younger startups are really excelling with generative AI,” Challapally said. Startups led by 19- or 20-year-olds, for example, “have seen revenues jump from zero to $20 million in a year,” he said. “It’s because they pick one pain point, execute well, and partner smartly with companies who use their tools,” he added.
But for 95% of companies in the dataset, generative AI implementation is falling short. “The 95% failure rate for enterprise AI solutions represents the clearest manifestation of the GenAI Divide,” the report states. The core issue? Not the quality of the AI models, but the “learning gap” for both tools and organizations. While executives often blame regulation or model performance, MIT’s research points to flawed enterprise integration. Generic tools like ChatGPT excel for individuals because of their flexibility, but they stall in enterprise use since they don’t learn from or adapt to workflows, Challapally explained.
The data also reveals a misalignment in resource allocation. More than half of generative AI budgets are devoted to sales and marketing tools, yet MIT found the biggest ROI in back-office automation—eliminating business process outsourcing, cutting external agency costs, and streamlining operations.

What’s behind successful AI deployments?

How companies adopt AI is crucial. Purchasing AI tools from specialized vendors and building partnerships succeed about 67% of the time, while internal builds succeed only one-third as often.
This finding is particularly relevant in financial services and other highly regulated sectors, where many firms are building their own proprietary generative AI systems in 2025. Yet, MIT’s research suggests companies see far more failures when going solo.
Companies surveyed were often hesitant to share failure rates, Challapally noted. “Almost everywhere we went, enterprises were trying to build their own tool,” he said, but the data showed purchased solutions delivered more reliable results.
Other key factors for success include empowering line managers—not just central AI labs—to drive adoption, and selecting tools that can integrate deeply and adapt over time.
Workforce disruption is already underway, especially in customer support and administrative roles. Rather than mass layoffs, companies are increasingly not backfilling positions as they become vacant. Most changes are concentrated in jobs previously outsourced due to their perceived low value.
The report also highlights the widespread use of “shadow AI”—unsanctioned tools like ChatGPT—and the ongoing challenge of measuring AI’s impact on productivity and profit.
Looking ahead, the most advanced organizations are already experimenting with agentic AI systems that can learn, remember, and act independently within set boundaries—offering a glimpse at how the next phase of enterprise AI might unfold.

Sheryl

Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard
Michael A. Discenza
was appointed VP and CFO of
The Timken Company
(NYSE: TKR), effective immediately. Discenza has 25 years of experience at Timken in roles of increasing responsibility, including the last 10 as VP of finance, and group controller.

John Cole
was appointed CFO of
ELB Learning
, a provider of immersive learning solutions. He brings more than 25 years of experience leading finance and operations for Fortune 100 and 500 companies, according to ELB. Cole aims to strengthen the financial infrastructure to support the company’s next phase of growth.

Big Deal
Modern manufacturing relies heavily on connected devices and industrial control systems, which are prime targets for cyberattacks. For protection, manufacturers are increasingly turning to AI to help manage these risks, according to the
State of Smart Manufacturing Report
by Rockwell Automation, Inc.

The report’s findings are based on a survey of more than 1,500 manufacturing leaders across 17 major manufacturing countries. Cybersecurity now ranks among the top external risks, second only to inflation and economic growth. One-third of respondents hold responsibilities spanning both information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) cybersecurity.

Nearly half (48%) of cybersecurity professionals identified securing converged architectures as key to positive outcomes over the next five years, compared to just 37% of all respondents.

However, a shortage of skilled talent, training challenges, and rising labor costs remain major hurdles. As manufacturers recruit the next generation, cybersecurity and analytical skills are becoming hiring priorities—reinforcing the need to align technical innovation with human development, according to the report.

Going deeper
In a new
Fortune

opinion piece
, "Future CEOs, erased: the economic cost of losing Black women in the workforce," Katica Roy, the CEO and founder of the Denver-based Pipeline, a SaaS company, explains the implications of almost
300,000 Black women exited the labor force
so far this year—thinning a pipeline that was already too narrow.

"This isn’t a seasonal fluctuation or statistical footnote. It’s a strategic failure with long-term consequences," Roy writes. "Black women have long been a cornerstone of America’s economic engine—driving participation, powering key industries, and anchoring family incomes. Now, that foundation is fracturing. And the fallout is more than short-term—it’s a direct threat to corporate succession planning, innovation, and growth. The U.S. economy has always depended on Black women’s labor. In fact, no group of women in America has historically had
higher labor force participation
than Black women."

Overheard
“Every single Monday was called 'AI Monday.' You couldn’t have customer calls, you couldn’t work on budgets, you had to only work on AI projects.”

—Eric Vaughan, CEO of enterprise software company IgniteTech, told
Fortune
in an interview
that he established a mandate: on Mondays, staff could only work on AI. In early 2023, convinced generative AI was an “existential” transformation, Vaughan saw that his team was not fully on board. His ultimate response? He replaced nearly 80% of the staff within a year, according to headcount figures reviewed by
Fortune
.

This is the web version of CFO Daily, a newsletter on the trends and individuals shaping corporate finance.
Sign up for free
.
About the Author
By
Sheryl Estrada
Senior Writer and author of CFO Daily
Sheryl Estrada is a senior writer at
Fortune
, where she covers the corporate finance industry, Wall Street, and corporate leadership. She also authors
CFO Daily
.

See full bio
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.
Add us on Google
Latest in Newsletters
Most Popular
Rankings
100 Best Companies
Fortune 500
Global 500
Fortune 500 Europe
Most Powerful Women
World's Most Admired Companies
See All Rankings
Lists Calendar
Sections
Finance
Fortune Crypto
Features
Leadership
Health
Commentary
Success
Retail
Mpw
Tech
Lifestyle
CEO Initiative
Asia
Politics
Conferences
Europe
Newsletters
Personal Finance
Environment
Magazine
Education
Customer Support
Frequently Asked Questions
Customer Service Portal
Privacy Policy
Terms Of Use
Single Issues For Purchase
International Print
Commercial Services
Advertising
Fortune Brand Studio
Fortune Analytics
Fortune Conferences
Business Development
Group Subscriptions
About Us
About Us
Press Center
Work At Fortune
Terms And Conditions
Site Map
Rankings
Sections
Customer Support
Commercial Services
About Us
Press Center
Work At Fortune
Terms And Conditions
Site Map
Latest in Newsletters
Most Popular
© 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our
Terms of Use
and
Privacy Policy
|
CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice
|
Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information

FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
</reference>

<statements>
1. Fortune's reporting of the MIT report says purchased solutions delivered more reliable results, while companies were often hesitant to share failure rates
2. Fortune's reporting says companies are increasingly not backfilling positions as they become vacant, with changes concentrated in previously outsourced roles
3. Fortune's reporting adds that companies surveyed were often hesitant to share failure rates and that the lead author, Aditya Challapally, emphasized flawed enterprise integration rather than model quality as the core issue
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.