You will be provided with a reference and some statements. Please determine whether each statement is 'supported', 'unsupported', or 'unknown' with respect to the reference. Please note:
First, assess whether the reference contains any valid content. If the reference contains no valid information, such as a 'page not found' message, then all statements should be considered 'unknown'.
If the reference is valid, for a given statement: if the facts or data it contains can be found entirely or partially within the reference, it is considered 'supported' (data accepts rounding); if all facts and data in the statement cannot be found in the reference, it is considered 'unsupported'.

You should return the result in a JSON list format, where each item in the list contains the statement's index and the judgment result, for example:
[
    {
        "idx": 1,
        "result": "supported"
    },
    {
        "idx": 2,
        "result": "unsupported"
    }
]

Below are the reference and statements:
<reference>
China's top court clarifies liability as intelligent driving gains ground - Chinadaily.com.cn



Global
Edition

China
Edition

ASIA

中文

Global
Edition

HOME

OPINION

VIDEO

WORLD

TECH

CHINA

BUSINESS

CULTURE

TRAVEL

SPORTS

HOME

OPINION

VIDEO

WORLD

CHINA

TECHNOLOGY

BUSINESS

CULTURE

TRAVEL

SPORTS

SERVICE

NEWSPAPER

China Daily PDF

China Daily E-paper

Subscribe

Home |

Motoring

China's top court clarifies liability as intelligent driving gains ground

By LI FUSHENG |
China Daily |
Updated: 2026-09-14 10:00

A staff member introduces assisted-driving features to visitors at the 29th edition of the Chengdu Motor Show in Chengdu, Sichuan province, on Aug 21. XU BINGJIE/XINHUA

China's top court has issued judicial guidance clarifying how courts should determine liability in disputes involving autonomous driving and driver-assistance vehicles, adding a new layer to the country's evolving regulatory framework for intelligent vehicles.

The Supreme People's Court said in an opinion released last week that when a vehicle defect and driver error combine to cause damage involving a vehicle with driver assistance technology, the injured party may seek compensation from both the driver and the vehicle manufacturer or seller.

More than 70 percent of new passenger vehicles sold in China so far in 2026 have been equipped with Level 2 driver-assistance functions, while more than 30 percent feature navigation-assisted driving, or NOA, according to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

As the technology has become mainstream, automakers have stressed that drivers are responsible for the safe operation of vehicles equipped with driver-assistance systems.

Huawei, for example, describes its Qiankun intelligent driving system as an assistance system rather than a substitute for the driver, while Nio says drivers remain responsible for monitoring the system and taking control when necessary.

But the Supreme People's Court makes it clear that the rule does not mean automakers automatically become liable whenever a driver-assistance vehicle is involved in an accident.

Where an accident is caused by a driver's violation of traffic rules, the mere fact that the vehicle's driver-assistance function had limitations would not by itself establish the manufacturer's or seller's liability.

But where a product defect and a driver's failure to exercise due care both contribute to the same damage, the two can constitute multiple causes of harm, with liability determined according to the respective contribution and degree of fault.

The top court's opinion also addresses potentially misleading marketing, an issue that has come under greater regulatory scrutiny following a fatal accident involving a Xiaomi car last year.

If manufacturers or sellers make false or misleading claims about a vehicle's level of automation, intelligence, performance or intended use, and such claims harm consumers' legitimate rights, courts should support claims for civil liability under relevant laws, it says.

Chinese regulators have been building a broader safety framework around intelligent vehicles.

In February 2025, the MIIT and the State Administration for Market Regulation issued rules strengthening the management of intelligent connected vehicle market access, recalls and over-the-air software updates.

The rules require automakers to conduct sufficient testing and verification of driver-assistance systems, clarify system boundaries and safety responses and report incidents involving system failures and vehicle collisions.

China had already begun testing a separate regulatory pathway for higher-level automated driving. In 2023, the MIIT and three other government departments launched a pilot program for the market access and road use of intelligent connected vehicles with Level 3 and Level 4 automated-driving functions.

In June, China also issued a mandatory national standard for the safety of Level 2 driver-assistance systems. The standard, developed under the MIIT, is scheduled to take effect on Jan 1, 2027.

The standard sets safety requirements covering system functions, data recording, vehicle manufacturers' safety responsibilities, human-machine interaction, user instructions and training.

It also requires manufacturers to clearly inform users about the system's capabilities, limitations and operating conditions.

The car industry has also begun experimenting with a different approach at the commercial level.

In May, BYD introduced a one-year safety guarantee for its urban navigation function on vehicles equipped with certain advanced versions of its driver-assistance systems.

Under the scheme, when the function is used in compliance with applicable requirements and the vehicle is involved in an at-fault traffic accident, BYD says it will cover direct economic losses attributable to the vehicle, including vehicle repair costs, third-party property damage and personal injury losses, within the scope of the guarantee.

Such programs do not change the legal allocation of liability, but illustrate how automakers are beginning to assume some accident-related financial risk as they promote increasingly sophisticated driver-assistance functions.

lifusheng@chinadaily.com.cn

Photo

Bumper harvest

Xi calls on BRICS to unite Global South, deepen cooperation

Xi on 'greater BRICS' cooperation

Xi attends second day of BRICS summit in New Delhi

Africa eyes initiative in disease control

Ties with new hometown sealed

Most Popular

Columnists

Western politicians need to stop fearmongering about Chinese goods

Fewer beggars, better lives: A story of China's progress

End the conflicts for the sake of humanity

Editor's Pick

What is behind Shein's drop in valuation?

Airbus-China partnership drives aviation growth

Special

2025 'Charming Beijing'

GMD SCO Summit Cities Tianjin

Grow with SCO

Russia-Ukraine conflict: Three years on

Global Edition

Copyright 1994 -
. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.

中文

Desktop

BACK TO THE TOP

China Edition

中文

HOME

OPINION

VIDEO

WORLD

CHINA

TECHNOLOGY

BUSINESS

CULTURE

TRAVEL

SPORTS

SERVICE

NEWSPAPER

China Daily PDF

China Daily E-paper

Subscribe

Copyright 1995 -
. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.

License for publishing multimedia online
0108263

Registration Number: 130349

About China Daily

Advertise on Site

Contact Us

Job Offer

Expat Employment
</reference>

<statements>
1. Chinese judicial guidance explicitly states that if producers or sellers engage in false or misleading publicity regarding a vehicle’s automation level, intelligence, performance, or usage, courts should support consumers’ claims for civil liability under the Civil Code and consumer rights statutes.
2. In China, both judicial guidance and case law establish that drivers remain liable in Level 2 semi-autonomous systems, framing ADAS as supportive tools that do not replace driver responsibility. However, the Supreme People's Court opinion allows injured parties to seek compensation from both drivers and manufacturers when accidents involve a combination of vehicle defects and driver error, with liability apportioned based on contributions and degree of fault. This codifies shared responsibility in scenarios where ADAS malfunction interacts with driver negligence.
3. Consumer protection doctrines further impose liability for false or misleading claims about automation or intelligence levels, and guidance such as that from China’s Supreme People's Court explicitly supports civil claims where such publicity harms consumers’ rights.
4. Comparative negligence and multi-cause tort theories allow courts to apportion liability between drivers and manufacturers based on relative contributions.
5. Academic proposals, like those in Iowa Law Review and Jurimetrics, recommend statutory architectures in which manufacturer liability applies when the computer driver is operating negligently in autonomous or supervisory modes, with liability gradually transitioning back to humans after effective takeover requests and reasonable intervals.
6. Building on Chinese guidance and U.S. scholarship, regulators should treat overstated autonomy claims as deceptive practices subject to civil penalties, restitution, and enhanced liability.
7. Current law generally treats Level 2 ADAS as driver-assistance tools, preserving primary driver responsibility, but product liability, comparative fault, and consumer protection frameworks increasingly recognize manufacturer and system responsibility where defects, design limitations, or misleading marketing contribute to crashes.
</statements>

Begin the assessment now. Output only the JSON list, without any conversational text or explanations.